news

WHO announces support for drug pricing transparency

55
SHARES

Member countries of WHO have agreed to support pricing transparency for medicines, vaccines and other health products.

Under the resolution, companies will share information regarding how much governments and other buyers are spending on health products. Adding to this, the World Health Organisation (WHO) is also calling for enhanced transparency on pharmaceutical patents, clinical trial results and factors that act as price determinants across the value chain.

 

Reserve your FREE place

 


Address the time-to-result challenge posed by short shelf-life radiopharmaceuticals.

20 November 2025 | 3:00 PM GMT | FREE Virtual Panel Discussion

This webinar showcases the Growth Direct System; an RMM (Rapid Microbial Method) that improves on traditional membrane filtration, delivering increased accuracy, a faster time to result, enhanced data integrity compliance, and more control over the manufacturing process.

Key learning points:

  • Understand the benefits of full workflow microbiology quality control testing automation in radiopharmaceutical production
  • Learn about ITM’s implementation journey and considerations when evaluating the technology
  • Find out how the advanced optics and microcolony detection capabilities of Growth Direct® technology impact time to result (TTR).

Don’t miss your chance to learn from experts in the industry – Register for FREE

 

As part of the project, WHO’s secretariat will review the effect of transparency on affordability and availability of health products, including the impact of differential pricing. “The aim is to help member states make more informed decisions when purchasing health products, negotiate more affordable prices and ultimately expand access to health products for the populations,” said WHO in a statement.

Transparency campaign group, Knowledge Ecology International (KEI), head James Love noted that the US, Japan and Switzerland supported drug pricing transparency proposals, but opposed research and development costs transparency. Germany, Sweden, Denmark and the UK opposed the majority of transparency proposals.

“The biggest achievement was the agreement that member states should ‘take appropriate measures to publicly share information on net prices’, ” said Love. “But there was also much more achieved, scattered throughout the document, in different paragraphs, on various transparency targets or topics.”

The resolution mandates that information on drug prices, sales, units sold, patents, public/private sector research and development costs and subsidies will be collected and shared.

The largest failure of the negotiations was non-disclosure of clinical trial costs, noted KEI.

Share via
Share via