Recommended

Resilient supply: safeguarding Europe’s generics
Sanofi’s ‘factory of the future’ vision
AI Act: data governance and compliance implications
mRNA vaccine research cut by RFK Jr
EU Biotech Act public consultation opens
FDA PreCheck programme encourages new manufacturing sites
President Trump targets US pharma supply chain resilience
CDMO Ofichem acquires Uppsala site from Meribel
WEBINAR | Mastering Impurity Profiling: USP’s Evolving Standards and Strategies | 15 OCT
webinar

Comparing EMA and Health Canada CTA submission for Phase I trials to US FDA IND application

Supported by:

9 March 2021

Watch now
135
SHARES

Supported by:

9 March 2021

Watch now

ABOUT THIS WEBINAR

Foreign clinical trial data is accepted under US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations to support New Drug Application (NDA) (including 505 (b)(2)) and Abbreviated NDA (ANDA) submissions.

It is a common assumption that pharma and biotech companies are focused on these regulatory submissions to the US FDA. In fact, US-based contract research organisations often provide what they refer to as their “standard Investigational New Drug (IND)-enabling programme” when initiating discussions with new clients. However, for a variety of reasons, the drug development strategy of many companies is to conduct first-in-human (FIH) clinical studies outside of the US.

To ensure the safety of Phase I healthy trial subjects, the generation and conduct of suitable non-clinical toxicology studies is documented in the international harmonised guidance ICH M3 R2. However, the presentation of this data as a well-argued case, conforming to local regulatory expectations and standards, is key to a successful foreign regulatory authority submission. 

 

ACCESS your FREE COPY

 


This report addresses the key factors shaping pharmaceutical formulation, including regulation, QC and analysis.

Access the full report now to discover the techniques, tools and innovations that are transforming pharmaceutical formulation, and learn how to position your organisation for long-term success.

What you’ll discover:

  • Key trends shaping the pharmaceutical formulation sector
  • Innovations leading progress in pharmaceutical formulation and how senior professionals can harness their benefits
  • Considerations and best practices when utilising QbD during formulation of oral solid dosage forms
  • And more!

Don’t miss your chance to access this exclusive report ! Access now – it’s free

This on-demand webinar provides an overview of a foreign health authority’s requirements for gaining approval to conduct an FIH clinical trial by comparing Health Canada and European Medicines Agency (EMA) Clinical Trial Authorisation (CTA) processes to that of the FDA IND submission. The presentation will cover the following:

  1. Highlight similarities and differences
  2. Provide an overview of the receiving divisions
  3. Summarise each regulatory agency’s review process, submission process and content
  4. Review timelines for CTA/IND submissions. 

Key learning outcomes:

  • Understand current considerations for emerging biopharmaceutical companies to ensure timely FIH clinical trials when planning early-phase drug development strategies
  • Learn how foreign clinical trials can support FDA drug approval
  • Explore 505(b)(2) NDA submission and how foreign clinical trials support this drug development strategy
  • Review the differences in the quality and non-clinical data submission requirements to gain approval from EMA, FDA and Health Canada to conduct an FIH trial.

Register

Register to watch this on-demand webinar

    Unless making a secure payment with your credit or debit card via a third-party payment processor, this form is not designed to collect confidential or sensitive personal information (e.g., financial information, social security numbers).

    *Required field

    Your details


    *


    *


    *


    *


    *



    *

    Other information

    Email preferences

    If you’re not already opted-in to receive our emails, please select which types of communication you would like to receive:


    Confirm that you're human

    By clicking register, you consent to European Pharmaceutical Review contacting you about this and future webinars, and that you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. Your information will be processed in accordance with GDPR and you can unsubscribe at any time.

    Speakers

    Dr Beatrice Setnik, Chief Scientific Officer, Altasciences

    Dr Setnik joined Altasciences in August 2019 and has been working in the area of clinical drug development and abuse potential assessment since 2005. She is an Adjunct Professor at the University of Toronto (Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology) and earned her doctorate degree from the University of Toronto. In her former role as Vice President of Scientific & Medical Affairs at INC Research/Inventive Health (Early Phase) she was responsible for scientific input on early phase clinical trials and in strategic initiatives in business growth and development. Her other previous roles include Senior Director, Clinical Sciences at King Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer, Inc. Dr Setnik has published numerous research articles in internationally recognised peer-reviewed journals and has presented at over 200 scientific meetings and conferences.

    Paul Sidney, Senior Director, Compliance and Regulatory Affairs, Altasciences

    Paul joined Altasciences as Senior Director, Compliance and Regulatory Affairs in 2020, with over 35 years’ experience in regulatory affairs and compliance. He has held senior management roles, developing and directing multi-site GLP and GCP regulatory programmes. He began his career with Sandoz Pharmaceuticals in the Medical Affairs Department in a team preparing and submitting NDA submissions to Health Canada. He subsequently joined BioResearch Laboratories (now Charles River Laboratories) managing a team of auditors assuring compliance for regulated non-clinical toxicology studies and clinical research in a Phase I unit. He was the founding president of the CCSQA and has presented on regulatory and compliance topics at society conferences and academic institutions. Paul holds a Bachelor of Science from McGill University.

    5 responses to “Comparing EMA and Health Canada CTA submission for Phase I trials to US FDA IND application”

    1. Vandana says:
      19 March 2021 at 3:23 am

      Hi, How can I watch this webinar?

      Reply
      • Hannah Balfour says:
        29 March 2021 at 1:54 pm

        Hi Vandana,
        To watch the webinar simply fill in your details in the registration section and it will take you through to a page where you can watch the video of the webinar.

        Reply
    2. prorelixresearch says:
      9 March 2021 at 10:42 am

      The post was very informative. Thank you!

      Reply
    3. prorelixresearch says:
      9 March 2021 at 10:42 am

      The post was very informative. Thank you!

      Reply
    4. prorelixeducation says:
      9 March 2021 at 8:48 am

      This webinar post helped me a lot. Thank you for your informative inputs.

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Share via
    Share via