Toxicology - Articles and news items


How Panacea is paving the way for vaccine immunotherapies

Blog, Z Homepage promo / 29 March 2017 / Niamh Marriott, Junior Editor

We caught up with the CEO & CSO of Panacea for the latest on vaccine immunotherapies – “As a scientist, as long as you are observant and persistent, you may come up with breakthrough discoveries”

Wickham Labs to exhibit at Med-Tech Innovation Expo 2017

Supplier news / 22 March 2017 / Wickham Laboratories Limited

Wickham Laboratories Ltd is pleased to announce that we will be on Stand 12 at the upcoming Med-Tech Innovation Expo, Ricoh Arena, Coventry, April 26-27…

The increasing role of toxicology in early decision making processes

The increasing role of toxicology in early decision making processes

Issue 2 2011, Toxicology / 19 April 2011 / Eckhard von Keutz, Senior Vice President, Head Global Early Development, Bayer HealthCare

Clinical development costs are rising at an alarming rate. There is a decreasing success rate for new drug candidate approval and the duration of development is increasing. In other words, industry is spending more and getting less from current drug development efforts. In 2010, 21 new drugs were approved in the U.S., the fewest since 2007, as the Food and Drug Administration showed more willingness to delay or reject medicines with potential safety risks1. Along these lines and according to a study conducted by the Biotechnology Industry Organisation and BioMedTracker, the success rate in bringing new drugs to market has fallen. The study looked at drugs moving from early stage Phase I clinical trials to Food and Drug Administration approval between 2004 and 2010. The researchers found that the overall success rate is about one in 10, down from one in five to one in six, seen in reports involving earlier years2.

Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Industry Advanced Training (PIAT)

Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Industry Advanced Training (PIAT)

Issue 4 2010, Toxicology / 19 August 2010 / Brian Lockwood, Director of PIAT, School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester

Toxicology is the study of the harmful interactions between chemicals and biological systems. Man, as well as other animals and plants, is increasingly exposed to a huge variety of chemicals. These range from metals to large complex organic molecules, all of which are potentially toxic. A toxicologist must understand pathology, biochemistry, chemistry and physiology as these disciplines all contribute to the impact of a given chemical’s toxicity. Indeed the multidisciplinary nature of toxicology makes the area of toxicology a challenging yet rewarding area for research and learning. To gain a true understanding of how a chemical can disrupt a biological system and cause toxic consequences is no easy matter.

Figure 1 Overview of DILI-sim A. Schematic overview of the key biological processes represented in DILI-sim B. Overview of different modules within DILI-sim. Each module is itself a model that captures a specific area of relevant biology, pharmacology and metabolism. This modular approach to DILI-sim allows the overall model to be built in manageable, testable pieces C. Knowledge management aspects of DILI-sim. Under each of the models, the supporting evidence is explicitly captured and hence the model acts as a highly structured knowledge repository

Applying systems biology and computer simulations to predicting idiosyncratic DILI

Issue 4 2010, Toxicology / 19 August 2010 / David Cook, Associate Director, Global Safety Assessment, AstraZeneca

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare adverse drug reaction which accounts for a significant amount of patient suffering, including death. Currently, idiosyncratic DILI is unpredictable and as a result arises late in the drug development process or even post-marketing. The prediction of idiosyncratic DILI based on preclinical or early clinical data is a formidable challenge and this short review will discuss why and how new initiatives in systems biology and dynamic computational simulations can meet this challenge and predict the ‘unpredictable’.


Segregation of molecular mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity across human, yeast and Salmonella species

Issue 1 2010, Toxicology / 22 February 2010 /

Screening assays for in vitro toxicity are the way to reduce the attrition rates in the preclinical development of new drugs. Here a test battery is presented for screening of genotoxic and carcinogenic compounds by means of VitotoxTM, RadarScreen, and four human liver HepG2 cell lines with two different promoters as well as responsive element (RE) settings in combination with a luminescent read-out. The VitotoxTM assay in Salmonella is a substitute for the Ames test and the RadarScreen assay for in vitro clastogenicity. Moreover, HepG2 assays with RAD51C and Cystatin A promoters, and p53-RE are more predictive for in vivo clastogenicity. The Nrf2-RE can be used for analysis of reactive oxygen species production. The validity of this battery is checked for 62 compounds of an ECVAM list for genotoxicity and for 190 other references or in house drugs.

Neurotoxicity in preclinical studies

Issue 6 2008, Past issues / 3 December 2008 /

Neurotoxicology is not a discipline that can expect to be popular in pharmaceutical circles. It is a not unreasonable prejudice amongst people working in drug development that even a suggestion that a candidate drug might be neurotoxic is enough to halt development, or at the least to stimulate a highly motivated search for an alternative. There are several good reasons for this. Firstly, neurotoxicity can be highly disabling and irreversible. Secondly, it is hard to detect (or rather to exclude) via high throughput systems. Thirdly, it is often hard to understand.

In vitro toxicity screening as pre-selection tool

Issue 3 2008, Past issues / 19 June 2008 /

Drug discovery relies on massive screening of compound libraries with in vitro cell-based target assays. These pharmacological screens have been well accepted. For in vitro toxicological screening, this privilege has only been obtained for the Ames, chromosomal aberration and eye irritation tests. At the moment, a number of cellular assays for cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, embryotoxicity, cellular metabolic activation processes and endocrine disruption await general acceptance. From that point onwards, tools will become available to identify unwanted pharmacological or toxicological effects at a much earlier stage in the drug development process.


The deadline for submissions to the EPR Awards is 9 June 2017! Entry is FREE, so don't delay...