news

Decision upheld in Merck hepatitis C drugs patent case

1
SHARES

A US appeals court has upheld a ruling that threw out a $2.54 billion jury verdict Merck won against Gilead over hepatitis C treatments.

A US appeals court has upheld a ruling that threw out a $2.54 billion jury verdict Merck & Co Inc had won against Gilead Sciences Inc.

 

ACCESS your FREE COPY

 


This report addresses the key factors shaping pharmaceutical formulation, including regulation, QC and analysis.

Access the full report now to discover the techniques, tools and innovations that are transforming pharmaceutical formulation, and learn how to position your organisation for long-term success.

What you’ll discover:

  • Key trends shaping the pharmaceutical formulation sector
  • Innovations leading progress in pharmaceutical formulation and how senior professionals can harness their benefits
  • Considerations and best practices when utilising QbD during formulation of oral solid dosage forms
  • And more!

Don’t miss your chance to access this exclusive report ! Access now – it’s free

As reported by Reuters, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a decision by a federal judge in Delaware that the Merck patent at issue in the case, which relates to hepatitis C treatment, was invalid.

Merck said in a statement it was disappointed with the decision and reviewing its options for an appeal.

Gilead said it was pleased with the ruling and confident it would be upheld if appealed further, the report continued

In 2016, a jury decided that Gilead’s hepatitis C drugs, Sovaldi and Harvoni, infringed the patent which Merck acquired when it bought Idenix Pharmaceuticals and determined that Gilead should pay $2.54 billion in damages, which was the largest verdict ever in a US patent case.

However, the verdict was tossed out in 2018, with the judge saying that the Merck patent should not have been granted in the first place because it did not meet a requirement that it disclose how to make the treatment it covered without undue experimentation.

This recent decision from the appeals court agrees with that determination.

Related organisations

,

Related drugs

,

Related diseases & conditions

Share via
Share via